om nomnomModerators: Anonymous G, Immelmann, arinot, QuetzaDrake
om nomnomProf. Faber from Farhenheit 451 by Bradbury wrote: You're afraid of making mistakes. Don't be. Mistakes can be profited by. Man, when I was young I shoved my ignorance in people's faces. They beat me with sticks. By the time I was forty my blunt instrument had been honed to a fine cutting point for me. If you hide your ignorance, no one will hit you and you'll never learn.





nuff said...
Rachel wrote:nuff said...
Your understanding on the benefits of Genetic enhancement/therapy appears to be lacking. Primaily because having glowing rats, is actually going to be counter productive to their survivial, not that Cat's need the extra-advantage to see mice in dim to dark lighting. To make glowing rats, is simply a vanity thing humans are going to do because they think it just looks fucking cool. v.v;
Do you even know the wing span you'll require, or the mass of muscles you'll need on your back for you to have functioning wings? Or that you'll require so much ATP just to flap around in the air for ten minutes? Ignoring the idea, that wings are evolved ARMS and HANDS*, there's still a lot of problems with the idea, that makes it unfeasible.
*The idea here, is that your either going to have wings, or your going to have hands that can use fine tools and open doors and type at the keyboard. (Although, yes you could type with a beak, but I'd feel bad for watching/laughing.)

wow this discussion really got rolling. thanks elmy, you hit the nail on the head. sorry i just figured out this little secret about there being "pages," but i still think this discussion has to move somewhere else now, like where can this go wrong and where can we stop it, hypothetically. there are so many scifi films where something gets screwy because we weren't being responsible enough. For instance, when i read about the wings idea it sounded like maximum ride, where even fictionally they're turning into piles of goo (well, character overdevelopment= either a stupid death or some kind of god-power) genetics requires something like 104% accuracy to do things like cloning or direct manipulation of DNA. what we're looking at here is something like quantum mechanics. (i have no clue but it sounds right) AND we have to deal with the whole baby ethics dealio since conventional modification requires change before birth and will likely involve stem cells..gif)
Rachel wrote:Do you even know the wing span you'll require, or the mass of muscles you'll need on your back for you to have functioning wings? Or that you'll require so much ATP just to flap around in the air for ten minutes? Ignoring the idea, that wings are evolved ARMS and HANDS*, there's still a lot of problems with the idea, that makes it unfeasible.


... erm... the glowing rats just means that current genetic modification just uses other genes...
As for wings, I bet there'd be a way to modify it to grow outta my back or something... hopefully...
And Why'd I need a beak?
Anyway, point is that genetic changes will start using other genes already known. I have a good idea of this from a friend interning at NIH and my own work...
asfargone wrote:i hate to be stern, but i think you can understand at this point where i was trying to go with this. the forum title is 'why be furry, why be part animal' now angstskunk did answer the question of why be furry, but i still think being part animal would be really cool...etc etc

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest